Table 3 Results of Post-Curriculum Survey

Strongly

Disagree

Disagree

Neutral

Agree

Strongly Agree

The presentations were well organized

0 (0)

0 (0)

1 (7.1)

6 (42.9)

7 (50)

The information presented was relevant to my practice

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (14.2)

9 (64.3)

3 (21.3)

Overall expectations were met

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (14.2)

4 (28.6)

8 (57.1)

The information presented is useful for training as a Hematologist/Oncologist

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (14.2)

4 (28.6)

8 (57.1)

The discussions improved my insight into disparities in Hematology/Oncology

0 (0)

0 (0)

2 (14.2)

4 (28.6)

8 (57.1)

Poor

Fair

Good

Very Good

Excellent

Overall clinical training in disparities in healthcare

0 (0)

0 (0)

3 (21.4)

9 (64.3)

2 (15)

Understanding of racial/ethical disparities in Hematology/Oncology

0 (0)

1 (7.15)

4 (28.6)

6 (42.9)

3 (21.4)

Understanding of gender-identity and sexual orientation in Hematology/Oncology

0 (0)

2 (14.3)

4(28.6)

5 (35.7)

3 (21.4)

Understanding of language barriers in

Hematology/Oncology

0 (0)

1 (7.1)

4(28.6)

4(28.6)

5 (35.7)

Disparities in clinical trials and access to novel therapies

0 (0)

1 (7.1)

4(28.6)

6 (42.9)

3 (21.4)

Journal articles

Panel discussions

Modules

Podcasts

What was your favorite session or part of the curriculum?

1 (6.67%)

12 (80%)

1 (6.67%)

1 (6.67%)

Yes

No

Do you feel you need more

training in healthcare disparities?

10 (71%)

4 (29%)

Yes

No

After this focus on health disparities, do you plan to incorporate health disparities into a future research or clinical project?

11 (79%)

1 (7%)

Yes

No

Would you recommend this curriculum to future hematology/oncology fellows?

10 (71%)

0 (0%)

Yes

No

Do you recommend that the fellowship program have a formal health disparities curriculum?

11 (79%)

3 (21%)