From: Reviewing the current state of virtual reality integration in medical education - a scoping review
REPORTED ADVANTAGES | Number of Reviews | Review References |
---|---|---|
PRACTICAL ASPECTS | ||
Availability/accessibility (e.g., low-cost models for low-income countries, no time restriction, easy setup, little space required) | 22 | [11, 19, 34, 35, 39, 44, 46,47,48, 58, 64, 65, 71, 72, 84, 92, 100, 102, 104, 109, 112, 113] |
Repeatability | 21 | [11, 19, 29, 30, 34,35,36,37, 44, 46, 48, 75, 84, 86, 96, 99, 100, 102, 103, 105, 112] |
Cost-effectiveness | 11 | |
Ethical acceptability (less use of animal and human corpses) | 9 | |
No supervision needed, reduced workload of instructors | 7 | |
Portability | 5 | |
No biological hazards by transmission of diseases | 3 | |
USER EXPERIENCE | ||
Improves satisfaction, self-confidence, educational experience, is fun | 6 | |
Tactile realism by real-time haptic feedback inclusion, multimodal sensorial stimuli | 6 | |
Satisfaction by user-friendliness | 5 | |
Emotional impact | 2 | |
SKILL DEVELOPMENT | ||
Hands-on training, hand-eye coordination, psychomotor skills, technical skills, theory to practise | 13 | |
Competence training efficiency (reduced operating times, minimising medical errors) | 12 | |
Improve judgement, critical thinking, decision-making, creativity, conceptual and procedural learning | 8 | |
Training of soft skills (communication, interpersonal skills, teamwork) | 7 | |
Improve situational awareness, attention span | 4 | |
CONTENT | ||
Safe, controlled environment (learn from errors, stress-free, no time constraints) | 17 | [29, 39, 41, 44, 47, 49, 58, 63, 64, 66, 77, 84, 89, 99, 105, 108, 115] |
Variability by many use cases | 13 | |
Training of high-pressure (complex, unexpected) & low frequency scenarios | 7 | |
Realistic immersive environments, higher authenticity | 7 | |
High degree of spatial understanding and visualisation | 4 | |
Versatile multi-user scenarios | 1 | [40] |
CLINICAL TRANSFER | ||
Patient safety | 16 | [29, 30, 32, 36, 38, 47, 49, 50, 55, 63, 69, 77, 84, 89, 98, 103] |
Better clinical outcome | 5 | |
Possibility of including patient specific information | 4 | |
ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK | ||
Automatic, bias-free measurement and performance assessment (vision and sensor-based tracking) | 11 | |
Instant, embedded real-time feedback | 7 | |
Standardised, reproducible feedback and simulation | 6 | |
Possibility of recording training data for evaluation feedback | 5 | |
DIDACTIC ASPECTS | ||
Addresses more effective self-directed / self-paced / individual/ student-centred learning and deliberate practice | 8 | |
Experiential learning possible (e.g., dementia) | 1 | [49] |