Table 5 Distribution of participants by their opinion about the usefulness of different remediation tools (grading 1 to 5)
Remediation | Likert scale | Frequency (n = 51) | Percentage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
Mind map | Very Poor | 1 | 2.0 |
Poor | 2 | 3.9 | |
Acceptable | 15 | 29.4 | |
Good | 21 | 41.2 | |
Very Good | 12 | 23.5 | |
Role play | Very Poor | 1 | 2.0 |
Poor | 0 | 0.0 | |
Acceptable | 1 | 2.0 | |
Good | 10 | 19.6 | |
Very Good | 39 | 76.4 | |
Viva | Very Poor | 2 | 3.9 |
Poor | 1 | 2.0 | |
Acceptable | 4 | 7.8 | |
Good | 12 | 23.6 | |
Very Good | 32 | 62.7 | |
Seminar | Very Poor | 3 | 6.0 |
Poor | 0 | 0.0 | |
Acceptable | 8 | 16.0 | |
Good | 22 | 44.0 | |
Very Good | 18 | 34.0 | |
Quiz | Very Poor | 1 | 2.0 |
Poor | 0 | 0.0 | |
Acceptable | 5 | 9.8 | |
Good | 20 | 39.2 | |
Very Good | 25 | 49.0 |