Skip to main content

Table 4 Structured feedback of students regarding jigsaw technique

From: Exploring peer learning module vs. conventional tutorials: effects on engagement and learning outcomes among first-year medical students

Sl No

Feedback Questions

Rating in Likert scale given by 150 students for Jigsaw learning activity in percentage of students

Poor

(1)

Average

(2)

Good

(3)

Excellent

(4)

1

Rate the Jigsaw active learning activity

1

6

45

48

2

Rate this learning style over traditional teaching style

2

8

49

40

3

Do you think each step in this activity is important?

2

15

45

39

4

Does this activity motivate to study the entire topic in detail? Rate it accordingly.

3

10

41

45

5

Have you developed some skills or enhanced skills you already possessed due to this activity? Rate it accordingly

2

9

48

41

6

Rate this activity in terms of fulfilment of learning objectives

2

12

48

37

7

Rate this activity according to the understanding of topics were developed.

1

5

49

45

8

Rate this activity in a way it helped you to realize the importance of these skills

Participation

0

11

45

44

9

Leadership

6

22

48

25

10

Teamwork

2

19

34

45

11

Creativity / resources

2

15

43

40

12

Relevancy to topic

2

14

49

35

13

Problem solving skill

2

13

52

33

14

Time management

3

20

43

34

15

Proper planning /strategy

2

11

48

39

16

Rate this activity good enough to perform on regular basis.

2

4

46

48

  1. The exploratory factor analysis of the structured feedback questionnaire was undertaken, items 1, 2,3,4,8,14 assessed the impact on motivation, the items 5,6, 9,10,11,12,13 assessed the impact on skill development and the item 7 assess the student engagement, it reveals strong correlation between JT on these parameters. (Table:5)