Skip to main content

Table 2 The SUCRA values of each intervention

From: Effectiveness of multiple teaching methods in standardized training of internal medicine residents in China: a network meta-analysis

Intervention

Theoretical test scores

Rank

Practical test scores

Rank

Medical record test scores

Rank

Score of autonomous learning ability

Rank

Number of dissatisfied people

Rank

LBL

2.2%

13

5.3%

13

3.6%

11

14.3%

5

0.7%

12

PBL

51.4%

6

49.2%

7

83.4%

2

75.8%

1

38%

9

PBL + SBT

44.2%

8

27.9%

11

—

—

—

—

—

—

PBL + CBL

66.1%

4

64.4%

4

60.7%

5

74.2%

2

52.1%

6

CBL

33.7%

11

42.3%

10

67.2%

3

—

—

50.1%

7

PBL + MDT

38.7%

9

57.9%

6

42.3%

7

45.2%

3

52.2%

5

CBL + CP

34.7%

10

71.3%

2

25.3%

10

—

—

26.7%

11

CBL + FC

32.2%

12

21.7%

12

26.4%

9

40.5%

4

64.3%

4

PBL + EBM

48.9%

7

48.8%

8

31.7%

8

—

—

48%

8

PBL + CP

80.3%

2

46.4%

9

99.9%

1

—

—

37.2%

10

PBL + Wechat

88%

1

71.2%

3

—

—

—

—

89%

1

CBL + Wechat

67.9%

3

63.6%

5

63.6%

4

—

—

69.3%

3

TBL

61.7%

5

80.1%

1

48.8%

6

—

—

72.5%

2

  1. LBL Lecture-based Learning, PBL Problem-based Learning, SBT Scenario-based Teaching, CBL Case-based Learning, MDT Multi-Disciplinary Team, CP Clinical Pathway, FC Flipped Classroom, EBM Evidence-based Medicine, TBL Team-based Learning