| Item and test analysis | Additional item analysis | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Content of questions | Number correct | Item diff | Disc. index | #Correct in high group | # Correct in low group | Point biserial | Adj pt. biserial | Scale mean if item deleted | Scale SD if item deleted | KR20 if item deleted | SEM if item deleted | Biserial correl | Adjusted biserial correl | ||
Pain assessment | Item 1: When assessing pain, what to ask the patient | 78 | 0.32 | 0.49 | 43 (0.57) | 7 (0.08) | 0.43 | 0.29 | 7.40 | 2.84 | 0.73 | 1.47 | 0.55 | 0.37 | |
Item 2: The effects of untreated pain | 159 | 0.65 | 0.49 | 66 (0.88) | 33 (0.39) | 0.45 | 0.31 | 7.07 | 2.83 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.57 | 0.39 | ||
Item 4: Case question: A patient who does not want to take opioids for pain relief. Primary intervention for this patient | 83 | 0.34 | 0.45 | 40 (0.53) | 7 (0.08) | 0.42 | 0.28 | 7.38 | 2.84 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.54 | 0.36 | ||
Item 5: Laboratory values in a patient with chest pain that should be reported to the doctor | 168 | 0.69 | 0.40 | 68 (0.91) | 43 (0.51) | 0.40 | 0.26 | 7.04 | 2.86 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.52 | 0.33 | ||
Item 13: Laboratory values should be reported to the doctor in a patient who is taking aspirin for the treatment of pain | 190 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 75 (1.00) | 35(0.41) | 0.68 | 0.60 | 6.95 | 2.74 | 0.70 | 1.49 | 0.95 | 0.83 | ||
Choosing the right scale for pain assessment | Item 3: The tools that are used to determine the intensity of the pain | 137 | 0.56 | 0.57 | 63 (0.84) | 23 (0.27) | 0.50 | 0.36 | 7.16 | 2.80 | 0.72 | 1.46 | 0.62 | 0.45 | |
Item 7: Most helpful pain assessment tool in the care of a young child with pain | 117 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 67 (0.89) | 13 (0.15) | 0.60 | 0.48 | 7.24 | 2.74 | 0.71 | 1.47 | 0.75 | 0.59 | ||
Item 12: The first step to take in assessing the pain of a cognitively disabled patient who could not report their pain correctly | 190 | 0.78 | 0.59 | 75 (1.00) | 35 (0.41) | 0.68 | 0.60 | 6.95 | 2.74 | 0.70 | 1.49 | 0.95 | 0.83 | ||
Usage and administration methods of analgesics | Item 6: The patient who should use opioids for a long time in pain management | 166 | 0.68 | 0.47 | 68 (0.91) | 37 (0.44) | 0.41 | 0.27 | 7.04 | 2.85 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.53 | 0.35 | |
Item 8: The route that is preferred for the daily administration of analgesics (all systems of the body are in working order) | 117 | 0.48 | 0.74 | 67 (0.89) | 13 (0.15) | 0.60 | 0.48 | 7.24 | 2.74 | 0.71 | 1.47 | 0.75 | 0.59 | ||
Item 9: The preferred route of administration when immediate and rapid action of an analgesic is required | 143 | 0.58 | 0.48 | 64 (0.85) | 32 (0.38) | 0.41 | 0.26 | 7.14 | 2.84 | 0.73 | 1.45 | 0.52 | 0.33 | ||
Item 10: Ranking drug samples in order of use according to the World Health Organization (WHO) analgesic ladder | 165 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 70 (0.93) | 43 (0.51) | 0.42 | 0.28 | 7.05 | 2.85 | 0.73 | 1.46 | 0.54 | 0.35 | ||
Item 11: The patient who is at risk of respiratory depression when taking an opioid | 180 | 0.73 | 0.45 | 70 (0.93) | 41 (0.48) | 0.48 | 0.35 | 6.99 | 2.83 | 0.72 | 1.48 | 0.64 | 0.47 | ||
Number of examinees = 245 Total possible score = 13 Minimum score = 0.00 = 0.0% Maximum score = 13 = 100.0% Median score = 8 = 61.5% Mean score = 7.72 = 59.4% Standard deviation = 3.01 Variance = 9.08 | Number of items excluded = 0 Number of items analyzed = 13 Mean item difficulty = 0.59 Mean discrimination index = 0.53 Mean point biserial = 0.49 Mean adj. point biserial = 0.36 KR20 (α) = 0.74 KR21 = 0.70 SEM (from KR20) = 1.52 High Grp Min Score (n = 75) = 10 Low Grp Max Score (n = 85). = 6 | Mean biserial correlation = 0.65 Minimum biserial correlation = 0.52 Maximum biserial correlation = 0.95 |